A Unique and Meaningful Life Essay -- Philosophy Essays

A Unique and meaning(prenominal) lifespan A unique and meaning(prenominal) life is compatible with the concept of a honourable cistrons thoughtful shed. In defense team of this assertion, I go forth beseech in favour of Barbara Hermans Kantian tidings of moral obligation, which suggests that moral strife occurs in the actors case of obligation. Grounds of obligation be facts recognized and considered by the agent during moral awkwardness they argon facts of a certain sort. They have moral substance because they are defining features of our (human) sagacious natures that limit what we can rationally testament (as defined by the CI procedure) (318).1 The grounds are non reasons for playing plainly are guides for maladroitness the facts considered in a given mail are founded in champions deliberative frame, namely matters of wideness to the moral agent.2 Similar to Hermans defense of Kant, I will argue that moral conflict may occur among the grounds of obligation in the agents deliberative frame, but never in hotshots duty because the CI will always determine solo if one moral obligation. I will then anticipate devil criticisms to counter Hermans defense of Kant. The first criticism proposes that the individual handle of deliberation - that defys not only the agents interest and private projects but also the interests of others as manageable sources of claims on the agents actions and resources (331) - can be given to conflicting assumptions about duties in the members of society as a whole. And the twinkling criticism arises from Hermans rejection of the stamp of guilt in the Kantian model, in situations of moral conflict.3 The critics I comprise accept that the moral agent has a life of her own following from the concept... ... 1990.Notes1 Throughout my paper, I will be using CI as short form for Kants monotonic Imperative2 I will be using both effeminate and male subjects when referring to the mor al agent3 A field of deliberation is another(prenominal) way of defining the deliberative frame (as described above) both contain grounds of obligation when referring to the considerations interpreted by the moral agent during her deliberation4 Basically there are only two options since given the opportunity, she essential save one.5 Restitution and rest are terms that need not be defined since my anticipate critics will focus on the design of guilt.6 It may seem that the heart of guilt is irrelevant to the discussion of an agents deliberative frame however, the second critic hopes that finding a flaw in Hermans argument will lead to a rejection of the concept. A Unique and Meaningful Life Essay -- Philosophy EssaysA Unique and Meaningful Life A unique and meaningful life is compatible with the concept of a moral agents deliberative frame. In defense of this assertion, I will argue in favour of Barbara Hermans Kantian discussion of moral obligation, whic h suggests that moral conflict occurs in the agents grounds of obligation. Grounds of obligation are facts recognized and considered by the agent during moral deliberation they are facts of a certain sort. They have moral significance because they are defining features of our (human) rational natures that limit what we can rationally will (as defined by the CI procedure) (318).1 The grounds are not reasons for acting but are guides for deliberation the facts considered in a given situation are founded in ones deliberative frame, namely matters of importance to the moral agent.2 Similar to Hermans defense of Kant, I will argue that moral conflict may occur among the grounds of obligation in the agents deliberative frame, but never in ones duty because the CI will always determine only one moral obligation. I will then anticipate two criticisms to counter Hermans defense of Kant. The first criticism proposes that the individual field of deliberation - that contains not only the agents interest and private projects but also the interests of others as possible sources of claims on the agents actions and resources (331) - can lead to conflicting assumptions about duties in the members of society as a whole. And the second criticism arises from Hermans rejection of the feeling of guilt in the Kantian model, in situations of moral conflict.3 The critics I present accept that the moral agent has a life of her own following from the concept... ... 1990.Notes1 Throughout my paper, I will be using CI as short form for Kants Categorical Imperative2 I will be using both female and male subjects when referring to the moral agent3 A field of deliberation is another way of defining the deliberative frame (as described above) both contain grounds of obligation when referring to the considerations taken by the moral agent during her deliberation4 Basically there are only two options since given the opportunity, she must save one.5 Restitution and Remainder are terms that need not be defined since my anticipated critics will focus on the notion of guilt.6 It may seem that the feeling of guilt is irrelevant to the discussion of an agents deliberative frame however, the second critic hopes that finding a flaw in Hermans argument will lead to a rejection of the concept.