'Explain ‘Natural Moral Law’ Essay\r'

'Natural Law lav be traced back into the antediluvian Greek and popish worlds. In Sophocles’ play ‘Antigone’, Natural Law is very app bent throughout and the writings of the Greek Philosopher; Aristotle. In his works †‘Nicomachean Ethics’ †he wrote;\r\nâ€Å"The pictorial is that which is everywhere, is as valid, and depends non upon organism or not being received…that which is infixed is unchangeable, and has the same power everywhere.’\r\nThe Ancient Stoics emphasised the importance of Logos, or rationality, that governs the world and sees gracious nature as one natural do. They considered natural law as a law of ‘ near reason’. In his letter to the Romans, St Paul wrote close to a law that is ‘written in the black Maria’ of Gentiles. It is at that placefore clear that throughout the ancient world, although there is differing terminology, there seems to have been a consensus over the pu blic of a natural deterrent example law, which dictated the rectitude or wrongness of an secondion that was not bloodsucking upon the laws created by society.\r\nSt. Thomas doubting Thomas developed a fuller account of this ‘natural law’ in the thirteenth century. This possibility is both deontological and absolutist and so his resulting work is focused upon the ethicacy of correspondions. In his work ‘Summa Theologica’, doubting Thomas described natural law as a moral code, which exists within the purpose of nature and was created by God. He says that it is present in every mankind being. Natural Law exists to aid humans, directing their actions in such away that they might meet their perfect(a) destiny. He argued that there was a basic law, from which all(a) the other natural laws derived. This was to pursue good and reverse evil.\r\nFor Aquinas, both the intention and the act are important, this is because his theory is based on a mainly deontolo gical regard. The lonesome(prenominal) end that he values is God as He is per se good. He believed that acts are intrinsically good or bad because when human beings act in accordance with their ultimate purpose, God is glorified. Aquinas followed the line of thought that human beings are agile and therefore should be able to direct him or herself, this therefore meaning that they can take tariff for knowing and doing what God intends for them.\r\nWhether or not an act leads towards God depends on whether it fits the purpose that humans were do for. For Thomas Aquinas, the main purpose of human vivification is to preserve the self and the innocent, to reproduce, worship God, acquire experience and live in ordered society.. He label these the primary coil precepts †acts that are in accordance with these precepts are good and those, which do not, are bad. He to a fault names them the secondary precepts †which are rulings about things that we should or should not do b ecause they uphold a primary precept.\r\nThe theory of Natural Law as station forward by Aquinas, is based upon the religious view that God created the world, establishing in it a sense of order and purpose, which is a direct representation of His will. In the natural law approach to ethics, the action itself can both be natural or unnatural, and is judged on that basis. It does not depend for its moral law justification upon every results. Therefore, according to natural law, an action can be deemed good in itself, even if it brings about suffering.\r\nIn conclusion, Natural Moral Law enables to establish rules in order to structure a community. It gives a cover reason to be moral and a hard basis from which to refuse to step over moral boundaries. It provides justification and support for certain core ideas and it adjudicate actions, irrespective of consequences. Natural Moral Law isn’t just simply a set of rules, plainly a way of living. It gives guidance on passing (a) questions on how to live and links them to the fundamental principles of life. It provides a complete system of moral living in step with what it is to be human.\r\n'